Category Archives: Statements

10 Statements (improvised via Mapping the Mind)

10 Statements (improvised via Mapping the Mind)

  1. ‘The answer ‘as facsimile (for the) ‘first story (works by) ‘pursuing the model (of the) ‘circuit.
  2. ‘Another ‘multifaceted ‘predisposition ‘arises (with the) ‘urge’ to wash ‘the mechanism.
  3. ‘However, ‘the range ‘of memories ‘in parallel streams (might) ‘work (as though) ‘rising (into) ‘an automatic ‘trigger.
  4. ‘Thinking about words ‘as representations (of) ‘accompanied ‘flight (might illustrate) ‘and produce a ’specific ‘feedback/’reward ’stream.
  5. ‘To discover (that) ‘we live (as) ’situation, (an) ‘abundance of ‘causal (and casual) ‘relation (leaving maps for) ‘forms (to follow).
  6. ‘To discover (that) ‘things change (according to) ‘an awareness of ’structure and function, (made strange and) ‘illuminated (by) ‘phenomenon, ‘a reminder ‘of regions.
  7. ‘Their skilled ‘patchwork ‘intuitively ‘indicated (via flow of) ‘no ‘condition.
  8. (Another) ’round of ‘processing ‘the flight (might reveal) ‘reminders, ‘gorgeous, ‘excitable, ‘marching right in ‘through ‘fascination’s ‘over-active ‘circuit.
  9. ‘Once ’suggested, ‘the distant possibility (becomes more) ‘active ‘in attention ‘according to ‘the firing rate ‘of memories (etc) ‘woven round (each moment of) ‘the drawing (forth.
  10. ‘We recall ‘this reading (it has changed) ‘the sound (of every channel) ‘they have gone (down).

A note on method:

Statements are improvised by rapidly flipping through the source text, pulling fragments together with a general “intent to state” something meaningful about the terrain. The apostrophes and parentheses meant to convey a rough sense of how I’m improvising the statements. An apostrophe denotes the start of a string found in the original text. A phrase in parentheses denotes a phrase I inserted (on the fly) to “drive” the emerging statement towards being more … statement-y.

Posted in Statements | Leave a comment

10 Statements (improvised via Conceptual Spaces)

10 Statements (improvised via Conceptual Spaces)

  1. ‘Domains (have a) ‘fuzzy (relationship) (in constant) ‘calibration (and collaboration) (with the) ‘metric (located in the) ‘projectible ‘concept.
  2. (Meanwhile), ‘the movement (of) ‘the other domains ‘conceives ‘its role (and assigns it a value).
  3. ‘The mapping ‘of examples (to themselves) (gives pleasure).
  4. ‘The grid (gives) ‘focus (to some) ’small ‘feats (of) (radical) ‘radial ’summations ‘obtained (via) ‘measurements (between).
  5. ‘Each class ‘handles (its objects) ‘with ’scales (and) ‘comparisons ‘underpinning ‘more precise (yet fluid) ‘multidimensional scaling.
  6. ‘It will ‘prototype ‘within the ‘concept (then) ‘generate ‘relations (to bridge dimensions).
  7. ‘Let us ’summarize (some of their) ‘names ‘as weights (, assign them values according to some game).
  8. ‘But when, ‘by and large, (the) ‘possible worlds (emerge), the ‘notion of salience (must yield some) ‘measurable ‘talking (and taking into) ‘perspective.
  9. ‘The link ‘forms ‘a special property.
  10. ‘A relation ‘is expanded ‘as a ’skin.

Key, or, how it happened:

‘ = string found in original text

( ) = inserted phrase

(note: statements are thought-objects and should be used as such)

Posted in Statements | Leave a comment