10 Statements (improvised via Conceptual Spaces)
- ‘Domains (have a) ‘fuzzy (relationship) (in constant) ‘calibration (and collaboration) (with the) ‘metric (located in the) ‘projectible ‘concept.
- (Meanwhile), ‘the movement (of) ‘the other domains ‘conceives ‘its role (and assigns it a value).
- ‘The mapping ‘of examples (to themselves) (gives pleasure).
- ‘The grid (gives) ‘focus (to some) ’small ‘feats (of) (radical) ‘radial ’summations ‘obtained (via) ‘measurements (between).
- ‘Each class ‘handles (its objects) ‘with ’scales (and) ‘comparisons ‘underpinning ‘more precise (yet fluid) ‘multidimensional scaling.
- ‘It will ‘prototype ‘within the ‘concept (then) ‘generate ‘relations (to bridge dimensions).
- ‘Let us ’summarize (some of their) ‘names ‘as weights (, assign them values according to some game).
- ‘But when, ‘by and large, (the) ‘possible worlds (emerge), the ‘notion of salience (must yield some) ‘measurable ‘talking (and taking into) ‘perspective.
- ‘The link ‘forms ‘a special property.
- ‘A relation ‘is expanded ‘as a ’skin.
Key, or, how it happened:
‘ = string found in original text
( ) = inserted phrase
(note: statements are thought-objects and should be used as such)